WA Secretary of State Blogs
From Our Corner

What if both liquor initiatives pass?

by David Ammons | July 2nd, 2010

 

It’s a logical question to ask: What if Washington voters approve BOTH of the rival initiatives to take the state out of the liquor retail business?

Alcohol initiativesLogical, but not easy to answer.

In short, the state Constitution, the statute books and the courts haven’t laid down a rule to follow in cases like this.  Some states use the common-sense approach that the one getting more votes will be implemented, but it’s no certainty what happens if both Initiative 1100 and Initiative 1105 get the green light from the voters.   Both would take the state out of the liquor business and let retailers offer hard booze along with their wine and beer. I-1100 would let retailers buy stock directly from manufacturers; I-1105 would require use of wholesalers.

The attorneys in our Elections Division and the Attorney General’s office say the usual rules of implementing conflicting statutes don’t address this unique situation where voters address the same subject matter at the same election.  The question would shift to the Legislature and/or the courts. Lawmakers, by a two-thirds vote in both chambers, could harmonize the two new laws or adopt one initiative and repeal the other, presumably less popular, version.

We’ve had close calls at least twice before: In 1993, when two rival tax-limit measures, I-601 and I-602, were on the ballot, and in 2005, when two rival initiatives to the Legislature, 330 and 336, written by the docs and the trial lawyers to address medical malpractice, went to the voters.  Voters approved 601 and defeated 602, and rejected both of the med-mal measures.

Then-Attorney General Christine Gregoire’s office did address the 601-602 question back in 1993.  The formal opinion observed that it would be possible for the Legislature to resolve any conflict by amending either or both measures with a two-thirds vote.  Failing that, the task would be for the courts to resolve the differences, possibly by giving deference to the initiative that got the most votes, as some other states’ constitutions provide.

So stay tuned.

4 Responses to “What if both liquor initiatives pass?”

  1. typical responce from our state govorment you didnt answer your own question…maybe your answer should be WIN WIN for the taxpayers…

  2. Jonzi Scheme says:

    “ted”, The answer to the question is that the scenario is without precedence, thus it becomes either a legislative issue or a court issue to reconcile the two initiatives so they can be put into law, as said very very clearly above.

  3. why not let the people who want to use distributors use distributors?? Yes on 1100 would give the choice to the businesses…. yes on 1105 would not.. This is the way I understand it. Am I wrong?

Leave a Reply

 


About this Blog

The Washington Office of the Secretary of State’s blog provides from-the-source information about important state news and public services. This space acts as a bridge between the public and Secretary Kim Wyman and her staff, and we invite you to contribute often to the conversation here.

On the Web

Comments Disclaimer

The comments and opinions expressed by users of this blog are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of the Secretary of State’s Office or its employees. The agency screens all comments in accordance with the Secretary of State’s blog use policy, and only those that comply with that policy will be approved and posted. Outside comments will not be edited by the agency.

Your Corner of Washington

Older Posts

Blogroll

Blog Contributors

Recent Topics